背景:对于累及主动脉根部直径不超过45mm的急性A型主动脉夹层,有各种主动脉根部修复技术。在这项研究中,介绍了一种采用心包自体移植进行主动脉根部修复的新型外科技术。我们详细描述了其手术步骤,并将其临床结果与直接缝合技术进行了比较。
方法:2017年7月至2022年8月,纳入95例接受主动脉根部修复术的急性A型主动脉夹层患者,包括使用心包自体移植的主动脉根修复术(A组,n=49)或直接缝合(B组,n=46)。对患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,并进行了5年的随访.
结果:30天死亡率,重新探查出血,术后新发肾功能衰竭需要持续肾脏替代治疗,中风,截瘫发生率为3%,4%,11%,5%,2%的患者,分别。两组30天死亡率和并发症发生率无显著差异。30天死亡率和再次出血是主要终点事件的标志。Logistic回归分析表明,主要终点事件与手术技术之间存在显着相关性(比值比,0.002;95%置信区间,0-0.159;P=0.026)。两组患者主动脉瓣关闭不全术后均有明显改善(A组,P<0.001;B组,P<0.001)。随访期间,两组术后短期生存率无显著差异(log-rankP=0.75),所有患者均未因主动脉疾病再次手术。
结论:使用心包自体移植进行主动脉根部修复的患者倾向于减少30天的死亡率和降低再次探查出血的风险。对于涉及主动脉根部的急性A型主动脉夹层患者,使用心包自体移植物进行主动脉根部修复是一种安全有用的方法。
BACKGROUND: For acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root with root diameter no more than 45 mm, there are various aortic root repair techniques. In this study, a novel surgical technique using a pericardial autograft for aortic root repair was introduced. We described its surgical steps in detail and compare its clinical outcomes with direct suture technique.
METHODS: Between July 2017 and August 2022, 95 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent aortic root repair were enrolled, including aortic root repair using pericardial autograft (group A, n = 49) or direct suture (group B, n = 46). The patient\'s clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and a 5-year follow-up was conducted.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative new-onset renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, stroke, and paraplegia occurred in 3%, 4%, 11%, 5%, and 2% of the overall patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality and complication rate between the two groups. The 30-day mortality and re-exploration for bleeding marked the primary endpoint events. Logistic regression analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between the primary endpoint events and surgical technique (odds ratio, 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.159; P = 0.026). The aortic valve insufficiency of the two groups were significantly improved after operation (group A, P < 0.001; group B, P < 0.001). During follow-up, there was no significant difference in short-term survival between the two groups after surgery (log-rank P = 0.75), and all patients were free from reoperation for aortic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent aortic root repair using pericardial autograft tended to have reduced 30-day mortality and a lower risk of re-exploration for bleeding. Using pericardial autograft for aortic root repair is a safe and useful approach for patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.